|
|
Post by bluesatinsashes on Sept 27, 2016 3:46:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by clarinetjamie on Sept 27, 2016 6:23:26 GMT
Love it!
|
|
|
|
Post by bluesatinsashes on Oct 1, 2016 21:25:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by indigoblue on Nov 10, 2016 0:36:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by indigoblue on Dec 26, 2016 23:52:40 GMT
 A Christmassy photo of Julie for you all! |
|
|
|
Post by indigoblue on Mar 5, 2017 22:56:01 GMT
 Does anyone know why/when this photo was taken? |
|
|
|
Post by gothicbutterfly95 on Mar 6, 2017 2:25:05 GMT
Not sure exactly. I would guess around the TSOM stage (so mid 60s), but can't say for certain, and I could be completely wrong.
Lovely photo though.
|
|
|
|
Post by indigoblue on Mar 6, 2017 23:56:04 GMT
I'm not aware that she ever had red hair at any other time.
The clarity of the photo is wonderful.
|
|
|
|
Post by utility_singer on Mar 8, 2017 12:14:09 GMT
It looks like the outfit she's wearing in some of the publicity photos with Chris----the one looking at the postcards in a shop, I think? I could be wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by bluesatinsashes on Mar 11, 2017 7:08:52 GMT
The photo looks overly saturated. Somebody's been playing around with Photoshop. Just look at her fingers and the back of her hand. They look like the same shade as her hair.
|
|
|
|
Post by utility_singer on Mar 11, 2017 14:13:25 GMT
Could be, but oversaturation was also a 'thing' back in the sixties. Several of the photos of me as a little tyke were given that treatment. Also in fashion was a sepia tone with a pastel highlighting of eyes, cheeks, lips, and whatever little toy or doll I was holding. And that was waaaaaaaaaaaaaay back before photoshop lol
|
|
|
|
Post by indigoblue on Mar 12, 2017 17:44:22 GMT
 Here is the photo of them looking at postcards; it seems Julie is wearing slightly different clothes to the photo of her on the branch - No matter, I'll take any opportunity to post this photo as they are standing oh, so close together...even touching? |
|
|
|
Post by bluesatinsashes on Oct 2, 2017 1:24:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by absurdlittlebird on Oct 2, 2017 7:59:59 GMT
I love the photo of her and Maggie Smith!! How absolutely beautiful <3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2020 20:54:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by indigoblue on Mar 30, 2022 23:39:22 GMT
paralleljulieverse.tumblr.com/There are some wonderful images of Julie at work in 1961 here, by Leonard McCombe, thanks to the wonderful ParallelJulieverse again. Also a great opportunity to bring up this lovely thread for you once more.
|
|
|
|
Post by reverendcaptain on Oct 3, 2024 17:11:04 GMT
I was looking at some pics of Julie today, and wondering why there aren't any that are more..va va voom. I'm not complaining! I LOVE a classy lady who doesn't need to be revealing for attention. I just wonder why she's like that. She's certainly beautiful enough and famous enough to have had racy photoshoots. Is it just her personality to be more reserved? Did she see herself as a wholesome family friendly movie star and didn't want to tarnish that?
|
|
|
|
Post by augiesannie on Oct 5, 2024 20:45:47 GMT
That’s a great question, reverendcaptain, and there are bigger Julie fans here than me who can probably give a better answer, but my understanding has been that she actually was a pretty spicy person and that it isn’t so much that she wants to preserve her wholesome rep (she did a topless scene for her husband) but that her early roles kind of stereotyped her. |
|
|
|
Post by reverendcaptain on Oct 16, 2024 14:43:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by indigoblue on Oct 18, 2024 23:59:16 GMT
I always found the plot of Victor/Victoria rather...improbable?
|
|
